💵 Money Flow: Today vs. My Model

Current System

🏢 Special Interest / PAC / Lobby Group
⬇️
🏛 Politicians in DC
⬇️
📜 Policy shaped to protect donors

💸 Money stays in Washington — spent on lobbyists, fundraisers, and insider access.
🏚 Communities see little benefit from the billions spent to influence a few hundred lawmakers.

My Model

🏢 Special Interest / Advocacy Group / Industry
⬇️
🧑‍🤝‍🧑 Voters in the District
⬇️
🗳 Representative bound to voter decision

💵 Money flows into communities — spent on local outreach, events, ads, and organizing to persuade voters directly.
🏘 Economically hard‑hit areas benefit from political dollars being spent locally.
📊 Policy shaped by the people — every vote tied to verified constituent input.

“In my system, they can’t buy my vote — they have to earn yours.”

🏘 From pay‑for‑influence to people‑first markets

When a representative’s vote is bound to verified constituent decisions, the old pay‑for‑influence model loses leverage. Money that once chased access in Washington has to compete for trust in our communities. The result isn’t just cleaner politics — it’s a healthier economy where ideas win in the open, dollars circulate locally, and industries succeed by proving value to the public.

🔁 How the incentives change

  • Access vs. trust: Dollars can no longer buy access to a pivotal vote; they must earn public trust with open arguments.
  • DC spend vs. local spend: Less on lobbyists and fundraisers in Washington; more on local outreach, events, and education.
  • Backroom vs. daylight: Claims and trade‑offs move into the open where voters can compare, debate, and decide.

🧭 What doesn’t change

  • Free speech: Groups can still advocate — they just have to persuade voters, not pressure a politician’s single vote.
  • Expert input: Data, pilots, and proof still matter; they just compete on merit, not proximity to power.
  • Local choice: Every district prioritizes differently; your will drives your representative, bill by bill.

🏥 Healthcare (patients, providers, payers)

  • Patient‑first reforms: Hard‑to‑pass ideas (network adequacy, simpler plans, faster prior auth) face fewer roadblocks.
  • Rural access: Local support grows for mobile clinics, telehealth, and staffing incentives where care is scarce.
  • Transparent trade‑offs: Cost, coverage, and quality debates happen in plain view with voter direction.

🛍️ Small business & Main Street

  • Local spending: Advocacy dollars fund town halls, local media buys, and community events — boosting foot traffic and jobs.
  • Simpler compliance: Voter pressure favors clarity and fairness over complexity that only big players can afford.
  • Faster feedback: Owners can weigh in on proposed rules before votes — and see results recorded publicly.

🚜 Agriculture & food systems

  • Fair hearing: Family farms and co‑ops get equal footing to explain real‑world impacts to local voters.
  • Targeted supports: Weather, input costs, and market access solutions align with district‑level needs.
  • Rural multiplier: More in‑district outreach spend circulates through ag communities.

🏭 Manufacturing & logistics

  • Workforce wins: Skills pipelines and apprenticeship incentives rise when communities demand them.
  • Balanced rules: Safety and competitiveness are debated openly with plant‑level realities at the table.
  • Local contracts: Advocacy events, facility tours, and vendor spend benefit industrial towns.

⚡ Energy & utilities

  • Community buy‑in: Projects earn support by proving local benefits and reliability, not by inside leverage.
  • Grid pragmatism: Voters can prioritize resilience, affordability, and phased transitions with real data.
  • Local investment: Outreach dollars fund public forums and emergency prep efforts in‑district.

🎓 Education & workforce

  • Aligned programs: Training dollars track local employer needs because voters demand measurable outcomes.
  • Transparency: Open dashboards and audits are easier to win when politics isn’t pay‑to‑play.
  • Community lift: Outreach spend supports schools, libraries, and workforce events.

💻 Tech & startups

  • Merit over access: Founders compete on solutions, not on who they know in D.C.
  • Clean pilots: Voters can green‑light pilots with clear safeguards and sunset reviews.
  • Local ecosystems: Meetups, demos, and civic tech hackathons funded in the district.

🏗️ Construction & trades

  • Project visibility: Community oversight favors shovel‑ready, high‑impact work.
  • Fair bids: Transparent criteria reduce insider advantages.
  • Skilled jobs: Advocacy spend fuels training fairs and placement events locally.

📰 Local media

Ad spend returns: Campaigns to persuade voters fund local news, radio, and community outlets — strengthening local journalism.

🏪 Venues & vendors

Main Street demand: Halls, restaurants, printers, AV, and security see steadier bookings for public forums and town events.

👥 Jobs & skills

Organizing work: Field teams, data ops, and event roles create pathways into long‑term civic and technical careers.

Reality check: This isn’t “money out of politics.” It’s money out of back rooms and into communities — where it must win arguments in daylight. Influence becomes persuasion, not pressure. The public keeps the receipts: every input, every vote, on the record.
Common questions

What if a group floods the zone with ads? Voters still decide. Competing views get equal access to the public square, and your representative’s vote will match the verified district decision — with a public audit trail.

Do experts still matter? Yes. Data and expertise become more valuable when arguments are public and must withstand scrutiny.

What about minority viewpoints? They gain visibility in open forums and can build support over time — without being shut out by insider access.

🏥 Redirecting Influence Dollars to Indiana Healthcare

Indiana is facing deep Medicaid cuts — an estimated $31 billion over the next decade, including $12.7 billion in losses to hospitals alone. These cuts threaten rural hospitals, safety‑net providers, and access to care across the state. But under my platform, the flow of political “influence money” changes direction — from Washington’s back rooms into Indiana’s communities — creating a new revenue stream that could help offset some of those losses.

📉 The Medicaid Cut Reality

  • $31B in projected Medicaid funding losses to Indiana over 10 years.
  • $12.7B of that hits hospitals directly.
  • Rural hospitals and clinics face closure risks, especially in underserved areas.
  • 180,000 Hoosiers expected to lose Medicaid coverage.

💵 How My Model Helps Offset Losses

  • Influence dollars can’t buy my vote — they must persuade you, the voters.
  • Healthcare stakeholders spend outreach budgets in‑district — on local ads, events, and partnerships.
  • Those dollars can fund mobile clinics, screenings, and health fairs as part of persuasion efforts.
  • Local spending boosts healthcare jobs, vendor contracts, and community health programs.
Bottom line: Redirecting even a fraction of the hundreds of millions spent annually on healthcare lobbying into Indiana communities could strengthen local healthcare infrastructure, support rural access, and help cushion the blow from Medicaid cuts — without raising taxes.