Single Subject & Transparency in Legislation Act — Side‑by‑side comparison

Overview: This table compares my Act against current congressional practice and state single‑subject rules. It highlights mega‑bills, hidden riders, deceptive titles, transparency, and enforcement.

Feature My Act Current Congressional Practice State Single‑Subject Rules
Mega‑bills / Omnibus Banned — one bill, one subject only. Common — omnibus packages combine dozens of unrelated measures. Prohibited in many states (e.g., FL Const. Art. III § 6; CA Const. Art. IV § 9).
Hidden riders Void — non‑germane provisions struck down in court. Routine — riders often buried in must‑pass bills. Courts enforce germaneness tests in many states (e.g., CO Const. Art. V § 21).
Bill titles Must be neutral and accurate; bans deceptive or promotional names; Parliamentarian certification required. Often misleading — titles used as political branding (“Clear Skies Act,” etc.). Several states require clarity in titles as part of single‑subject rules.
Transparency 72‑hour public posting; each section cites statutory authority; no “and for other purposes.” No uniform posting rule; vague catch‑all titles common. Many states require advance posting and clear subject lines.
Enforcement Citizens can sue; courts strike riders or titles; attorney’s fees awarded; sponsors censured; committees lose budget. Weak — House Rule XXI nominally bans legislating in appropriations, but rarely enforced. State courts routinely strike down multi‑subject or misleading bills.

Bottom line: “My Act ends mega‑bills, bans deceptive titles, and forces Congress to legislate issue by issue, in the open, with no hidden pork.”

Legal and Institutional References: Congressional Budget Act of 1974 (2 U.S.C. 621 et seq.);
Florida Constitution, Art. III § 6;
California Constitution, Art. IV § 9;
Colorado Constitution, Art. V § 21;
Philippines Constitution, Art. VI § 26(1);
Switzerland Federal Constitution (unity of subject matter);
GAO Reports on riders and appropriations opacity;
Yale Law & Policy Review (2013) on bill naming;
The Conversation (2022) on misleading titles.